I’ve gone on and on about the fit and cushioning, but to be honest, those aren’t the best things about the Triumph ISO. There was no heel slippage, and the upper flexedwell. I am extremely picky about fit, and I can honestly say this was possibly the best, most comfortable running shoe I’ve ever worn. The ISOFIT construction of the upper is intended to move with your foot, and I thought it performed as intended, and admirably. The seamless construction contributed to a distinct lack of friction, meaning no blisters. It felt as if if cradled my foot without being restrictive or hampering my foot motion in any way.
#Itriumph iso iso
The fit of the Triumph ISO was true to size, and I can’t say enough about its comfort. I found the traction to be sufficient on pavement as well as on non-technical dirt trails and gravel roads. The Triumph ISO has an 8mm heel to toe offset, which I quite like, but runners looking for a low to zero drop should be aware. I was unable to wear my Triumph 10s enough to be able to vouch for the 20%, but they were very cushioned, with forces distributed evenly across the foot, preventing hotspots. The PWRGRID+ sole technology is designed to provide 20% more cushioning without an increase in weight. I did find the cushioning to be a bit much for intervals and speed work, as the incredible cushion sacrificed a bit of ground feel and energy transfer. It felt fantastic on long runs, leaving me with no residual foot soreness or fatigue. The sole of the Triumph ISO was very well cushioned. Once I put them on, I had high hopes for the Triumph ISO as they felt incredibly cushioned as well as having that fantastic fit I was promised. The upper is nearly seamless, so those so inclined could probably get away with running sockless. Out of the box, I noticed it felt quite light for a highly cushioned shoe, and the colors and aesthetic design were pleasing to the eye. The Triumph ISO is highly cushioned, perfect for a high mileage runner putting in long days out on the roads. I have a pair of near pristine Triumph 10s in my garage that I’m unable to wear due to the Saucony symbol overlay on the lateral sides rubbing horribly along the outside of my foot, and because of this I shied away from the Triumph 11s.īut the accompanying literature about the Triumph ISO promised an incredible fit, so I decided to dive in. When asked to review this latest version, I hesitated briefly. As hinted by the alternate naming of ISO rather than a numerical naming scheme, the line has been revamped. All this is taken into account in our reviews of each shoe.The Saucony Triumph ISO is the latest iteration of the Triumph line. In addition to measuring a shoe’s weight, we measure sole thickness (everything that sits between your foot and the road), how well the foam cushions your stride, and the flexibility of the forefoot. We put each shoe through real-world usage and a battery of mechanical tests in our lab to provide you with objective-and exclusive-data. “I got used to the feeling and found it to be comfortable, but initially I felt like I wasn’t tying the shoe tightly enough to keep my heel in place.” All the Stats You Need! Men’s
“Though my heel didn’t actually slip, the heel of the shoe felt loose,” explained one tester. However, testers said they never felt as though they were slipping out of the Triumph on runs, which could be owed to the redesigned heel shape in the 4th version. While some liked the added padding, others thought it felt a little too bulky and made the shoe feel too loose.
The most significant change testers noticed from the shoe’s predecessor was a softer, more cushioned collar foam around the ankle. “The lacing system makes it easy to get a comfortable fit.” “This shoe fits like a glove,” one tester commented. UpperĪs its name indicates, the Triumph ISO 4 features the ISOFit upper and lacing system, designed to adapt and move with the foot for a fit that feels custom-made.
However, Saucony stayed consistent with the shoe’s tread, borrowing the same zig-zag rubber construction that boosts both traction and flexibility. While this didn’t lighten up the shoe, it did help create an overall lower profile from the 3rd generation. Saucony tidied up the Triumph silhouette by shaving off about two millimeters of midsole and removing some extra rubber from the outsole. “The shoe just didn’t provide a stable enough ride (for me).” Outsole “As a heel striker in the 195-pound range, I had the heel foam give out,” explained one tester. In addition, heavier testers found that they needed a little more support underfoot to manage the shoe’s high cushioning. While the Triumph does offer slight stability, it serves neutral-footed runners best.
0 kommentar(er)
